November 2, 2015 Executive Compensation Executive & Director Pay Design Articles

Resource Library / Insights / Articles
Executive & Director Pay Design

Pay for performance or pay for results?

The challenge for boards: managing the balance between management impact and shareholder return.

For the last few decades, the focus of executive compensation has been to align pay with performance. Nearly every company includes “pay for performance” as a core principle of the executive compensation design, and compensation committees consider managing the pay for performance relationship as one of their primary governance responsibilities. But what exactly does “pay for performance” mean? For most companies, pay for performance has traditionally meant the following: identify key business metrics; set challenging but attainable performance objectives; and deliver pay for achieving those objectives.

In concept, this is a perfectly rational approach to executive pay. If the selected performance metrics align with the drivers of long-term value creation, then ultimately management’s pay will align with the interests of shareholders. Deliver a large portion of the pay in stock to further align the interests of executives with shareholders, and everybody wins. What could be wrong with that?

View the full article as it was originally published.

John Borneman

This article was originally published in Directors & Boards.

Related Insights

View Insight Collections

by Theme or Search