/ /

2016 Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

Published March 10, 2016

Public companies are beholden to align long-term interests of executive officers with those of their shareholders, and this balance often manifests in how executives are paid in relation to company performance.

Many companies address this through use of equity packages, but because executives can still sell or hedge these shares, their incentives to make long-term decisions for the company are not always clear. To avoid this, many companies implement stock ownership guidelines, requiring executives to own a certain amount of equity in the company.

Ownership guidelines require executives to obtain a certain amount of shares within a set timeframe, and holding requirements mandate that they retain a certain amount of shares received through vesting of stock or exercising of options. Aside from incentivizing executives, implementing one or both of these policies is important for shareholder support and for proxy advisors when justifying of pay packages.

In this report, Equilar examined various trends and components of executive stock ownership over the 2012, 2013 and 2014 fiscal years for Fortune 100 companies, and found that a combination of ownership guidelines and holding requirements has increased considerably in that time frame. In addition, there has been a steady increase in the value of required stock ownership over the past three years. Overall, Fortune 100 companies are implementing more restrictive stock ownership requirements with a higher median target value of required equity.

View the full article as it was originally published.

Seamus O’Toole

This article was originally published in Equilar.

Related Insights

Director Compensation Practices

in the Russell 3000 and S&P 500 - 2021 Edition

Corporate boards of directors face a more acute set of challenges in setting their compensation than they have in recent years. Until recently, a primary focus was the risk of shareholder litigation challenging allegedly excessive director compensation. That concern has receded as many companies have taken steps to mitigate the risk of lawsuits.

June 17, 2021 | The Conference Board

Executive & Director Pay Design

Reports

Balancing Pandemics & Board Service

While the Covid-19 crisis has caused a significant increase in board workload, the increased responsibilities relating to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters will continue.

May 21, 2021 | Agenda

ResilienceExecutive & Director Pay Design

Articles

SPACs, ESG Issues Raise Responsibilities

Going public means adding structure and formality to many areas of a company. Part of that structure includes forming a compensation committee with a clear charter, delineated responsibilities, and a calendar of actions.

May 10, 2021 | NACD/Directorship

ESG & Human Capital ManagementExecutive & Director Pay Design

Articles

Compensation as a Lever in the Retail Industry

Brick-and-mortar retailers have faced a mounting set of challenges in recent years as they’ve sought to adapt to an increasingly omnichannel ecosystem. While the trend was slow-moving at first, the pandemic’s impacts on consumer behavior has been anything but—accelerating the growth of digital channels and driving changes from which there is no turning back.

April 28, 2021

Executive & Director Pay Design

Articles

Three Key Compensation Issues In Retail for Q1 2021

The coronavirus pandemic has profoundly shaken the retail sector. Rapid changes in consumer behavior, supply chain disturbances, and government-mandated store closures contributed to a diﬃcult 2020.

February 24, 2021

ResilienceExecutive & Director Pay Design

Articles